How Much Asbestos Can Cause Mesothelioma?



How Much Asbestos Can Cause Mesothelioma?

Posted on Friday, May 02, 2014.



Avoid exposure to asbestos – especially if you are a smoker. That is the central message in an article by two Dutch cancer researchers who have some good news and some bad news about the link between asbestos exposure and malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Pulmonologists Dr. Paul Baas and Dr. JA Burgers of AVL/NKI Cancer Center in Amsterdam analyzed a study of 58,279 Dutch construction workers from 1986 to 2007. The study, published by Offermans et al in the January 2014 issue of the Journal of the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, confirmed what past research has found – that the risk of lung cancer, laryngeal cancer, and mesothelioma increased as asbestos exposure increased.

"The risk of development of lung cancer was higher for anyone with increased years of exposure to asbestos fibre combined with a smoking habit," write Baas and Burgers in a Dutch medical journal. This is potentially bad news for the thousands of workers around the world who have worked with or around asbestos without adequate protection.

The good news, say the researchers, is that the study also suggests that the risk of mesothelioma to the general public is lower – though not non-existent – from brief asbestos exposure, such as the exposure a person might encounter walking by a dusty construction site. However, the risk of developing mesothelioma from even short-term asbestos exposure is still higher among people who smoke than it is among non-smokers.

But the Dutch doctors also say that laws regarding safe handling and removal of asbestos are still critical for protecting the general public and workers since even a small amount can be dangerous. In the US, the Environmental Protection Agency has established handling and disposal guidelines for workers who have to remove asbestos-containing materials from older homes and businesses.

Although the same guidelines also apply to do-it-yourself homeowners, the EPA says most homeowners should not handle asbestos by themselves. Instead, they recommend that homeowners who need to remove asbestos as part of a renovation or remodeling project call a certified asbestos abatement professional in order to minimize the risk of developing mesothelioma years later.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma is a highly aggressive cancer with no known cure. Asbestos and a similar fibrous mineral called erionite are the primary causes of mesothelioma.

Source: Baas, P and Burgers, JA, "Is one single exposure to asbestos life-threating?", March 4, 2014, Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde

Original Post By: http://ift.tt/1fBJilP

Source : http://ift.tt/1iMmev2

Bay State drugmaker targets asbestos



Heather Von St. James, 45, remembers her father, a demolition worker, coming home covered in dust and dirt. Still, she'd hug him each night and, sometimes, put on his coat and shoes to play.

Thirty years later, she paid a price. At age 36, with a 3-month-old daughter, Von St. James was diagnosed with mesothelioma, a deadly, incurable cancer tied to asbestos exposure that can take decades to develop and often kills within months after symptoms appear. She was told her only chance to live was to have a lung removed.

She opted for surgery, and later learned she had excised the disease in time. "There a lot of people who don't," Von St. James, of St. Paul, Minnesota, said by telephone.

Last year, more than 107,000 people worldwide died from mesothelioma. Now, drugs developed by a wave of drugmakers, from tiny Verastem Inc. in Cambridge, Mass., to giant GlaxoSmithKline Plc in London, are bringing new hope that the deadly disease's silent march within the body may be slowed or stopped.

"This is not a curable cancer," said Dean Fennell, lead investigator in a trial studying Verastem's drug. "It's not a disease that can be wiped out completely by surgery as you see with lung cancer. Finding ways to stop that process or slow it down can have big implications for patient survival."

Mesothelioma, unlike lung cancer, mostly affects the cells covering the lungs, and can also strike tissues around the heart and abdominal organs. As with all cancers, doctors treat mesothelioma by cutting it out, or irradiating it, both of which can carry dangerous side effects.

Verastem, Glaxo

The drug being developed by Verastem is in late-stage human testing. Glaxo's compound is being tried in combination with another product in an early-stage study. Both target an enzyme involved in cell movement, allowing the cancer to spread.

The enzyme is overabundant in many tumors and is a hallmark of aggressive cancers that spread quickly. Patients with an inactive gene called Neurofibromatosis 2, or NF2, respond best to such drugs, and about half of mesothelioma patients have inactive NF2s.

Verastem has been granted orphan drug status in the U.S. and Europe for its product, VS-6063. That means it would have seven years of market exclusivity from the time of approval. If cleared for sale, the drug may generate $450 million by 2019, according to the average of four analysts' estimates compiled by Bloomberg.

Earliest Stage

The medicine, also known as defactinib, targets cancer at its earliest stage: cancer stem cells, which are thought to be the source of the cancer and often resist existing therapies. Mesothelioma cancer stem cells are particularly hardy in that they can survive chemotherapy, Fennell, who is chairman of thoracic medical oncology at the University of Leicester in England, said in an interview.

"The hope is we can suppress the cancer in such a way that it becomes a more chronic disease, rather than have a disease that's going to progress relentlessly and kill the patient," said Fennell, who doesn't have a financial stake in Verastem and isn't a paid consultant, according to the company.

While Verastem, which has a market value of about $215 million, is developing the drug on its own, it has an array of industry heavyweights providing guidance. Board members and advisers include former Genzyme Corp. Chief Executive Officer Henri Termeer; Eric Lander, a principal leader of the Human Genome Project; and Phillip Sharp, a Nobel laureate who helped establish the company now known as Biogen Idec Inc.

Controlling Ownership

"Controlling ownership of our products is key to value creation," said Robert Forrester, Verastem's chief executive officer. "As we pursue clinical development and possible commercialization, we want to make sure that we retain the potential for a significant return on the development investment we are making for our shareholders."

AstraZeneca Plc of London is testing tremelimumab, which it licensed from Pfizer Inc., in mesothelioma in a mid-stage trial. The treatment works differently from the other drugs in development in that it helps the immune system recognize and kill cancer cells.

Glaxo, the U.K.'s biggest drugmaker, plans to test GSK2256098 in combination with some of its other medicines to potentially make cancer treatments more effective, Carolyn Buser-Doepner, vice president for tumor signaling at the London- based company, said in an interview. In one early-stage trial, it will be paired up with Glaxo's Mekinist, which is approved for melanoma.

"The pre-clinical data are very encouraging," she said. "We're very excited about it."

Boehringer's Drug

Glaxo said it will continue developing the drug after selling most of its cancer medicines to Novartis AG for as much as $16 billion. Novartis will have the right to partner with Glaxo on the product.

A fourth drug, nintedanib from Germany's Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH, is in early-stage testing for mesothelioma, according to a spokesman. It works differently than the other two medicines, targeting three proteins involved in the formation of blood vessels that feed tumors.

While it's encouraging to see treatments being tested for mesothelioma, the kind of research most likely to yield improvements in care is that looking into the nature of the disease itself, said Noel Snell, director of research at the British Lung Foundation.

"It is shameful that this kind of fundamental research remains so drastically underfunded, and that the number of trials available for mesothelioma patients is still dwarfed so dramatically by the number available to other cancer patients," Snell said in a statement.

In the U.S., $8.8 million in government funding has gone to research the disease, according to the Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation.

Miracle Fiber

Asbestos was commonly used in building materials such as insulation for years because it was cheap, abundant and heat- resistant. Considered a "miracle fiber," it has been the subject of lawsuits claiming losses and damages from asbestos- related illnesses.

While some countries have banned asbestos mining, it continues in Russia, China and India, and the World Health Organization estimates as many as 125 million people worldwide are exposed to asbestos either at work or in their homes.

Mesothelioma can lay dormant for as long as 50 years before spreading, which explains why rates have risen long after many countries have banned the substance.

New cases in the U.K., where asbestos was restricted starting in the 1980s and outlawed fully in 2006, were 2,125 in 2012 and are expected to peak in 2015. Rates have been stable in the U.S., hovering around 3,000 new cases a year since 2000 due to education efforts, though a complete ban was overturned in the courts. Canada, which was one of the world's largest asbestos exporters, closed its remaining mines in 2011.

Japan 'Tsunami'

In Japan, where asbestos has been banned since 2006, the government pays the full cost of treatment for related illnesses and rates are expected to rise until 2027. Ken Takahashi, the lead author and director of a World Health Organization occupational health group, warned that Asian governments must brace themselves for an "asbestos tsunami."

"In the early '70s, this was an incredibly rare disease," Fennell said. "Now my clinic is full of patients with mesothelioma. Because the rates are increasing, we have a real need now to identify effective treatment."

For survivors like Von St. James, who has trouble breathing during the Minnesota winter with her one remaining lung, a solution can't come fast enough. She volunteers to coach patients through the deadly cancer, and says it's hard to watch so many friends lose the battle.

"The survival rate is pitifully 4 percent, most people don't live past 15 or 18 months," she said. "If they can keep it under control, that's the first hope."



Original Post By: http://ift.tt/1lMCyBm

Source : http://ift.tt/1lMCyBm

Emmerdale Donna story gets darker, says Verity Rushworth



Emmerdale star Verity Rushworth has promised that her emotional storyline will get "bigger and darker".

The actress is currently featuring in sad scenes as her character Donna Windsor is terminally ill and only has a few months left to live.



Donna has so far only confided in Rhona Goskirk (Zoe Henry) about the situation, and is reluctant to tell anyone else the truth for the time being.

Rushworth told the of the story's future: "It changes gear and spirals into real intense drama. It gets bigger and darker than just Donna being ill. It gets much more thrilling.

"It's kind of to do with her working in the police where she is put in a situation. I can't say much more but viewers will love it."



The 28-year-old also revealed that she has been inspired by former Coronation Street actress Julie Hesmondhalgh following her portrayal of Hayley Cropper's pancreatic cancer storyline.

Rushworth said: "Julie had to lose a lot of weight and I know that's one of the symptoms of Donna's rare lung cancer, mesothelioma, so I am thinking about that too. It won't be easy now I am back eating my mum's Yorkshire puddings!

"We don't know yet whether Donna will die on screen though, but Julie definitely inspired me to do this well."

Digital Spy Soap Scoop video - hit play below for gossip on Lucy Beale murder suspects in EastEnders, Windass secrets in Coronation Street, a DNA test in Emmerdale and more scheming from Sienna in Hollyoaks.

Get the Inside Soap magazine on your iPhone or iPad

Original Post By: http://ift.tt/1ho7L9g

Source : http://ift.tt/1ho7L9g

Search for jobs in the North East



The length of time people can expect to live free from a chronic illness or disability is lowest in the North East, new figures show



Easington MP Grahame Morris

People in the North enjoy good health for less time than their southern counterparts, new figures have revealed.

The length of time people can expect to live free from a chronic illness or disability is lowest in the North East compared to elsewhere in the country, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) has shown.

Disability-free life expectancy at birth is 60.5 for males in the region and for females it is 60.6, while in the South East it is as high as 66.2 for males and 67.3 for females.

MPs have hit out at the Government for failing to do more to protect the health and well-being of the those in the region.

Labour Easington MP Grahame Morris, a health select committee member, said: "These are another set of disturbing statistics highlighting the health inequalities that so disadvantage our region.

"Targeted interventions are required from Government and the application of resources to address these unequal health outcomes. It is further confirmation of the North-South divide in health.

"I believe there is a link to our region's industrial past. Many chronic conditions such as mesothelioma emphysema and chronic obstructive airways disease take many years to develop and are linked to working in heavy industries such as shipbuilding, coal mining and the chemicals industry that were prevalent in the North East.

"There is also a public health dimension and a strong case for early intervention to prevent chronic conditions developing downstream in later life.

"It is a vindication of the successful campaign in the region to resist Government attempts to alter health funding allocations. The Government sought to alter the funding formula away from health inequalities and transfer resources from deprived areas of the North East perversely to benefit more affluent areas in the South East where people enjoy better health and live longer."

The ONS figures reveal that between 2008 and 2010, County Durham was the worst performing area in the North East in terms of disability-free life expectancy at birth; for males it was 57.7 years and for females it is 57.6.

This was closely followed by Sunderland with males at 58.1 and females at 58.5. In Gateshead it was 58.4 for males and 60.8 for females.

Director of Public Health for Gateshead, Carole Wood said: "Gateshead residents are becoming ill before they reach retirement age. Tackling the causes of preventable ill health is very much the focus of our health programmes.

"We are trying to improve health by supporting people to make healthy lifestyle choices, change their behaviour and recognise symptoms earlier but we also have wider ambitions to improve everyday living environments, help people into employment and improve mental health. These can be things that influence physical health significantly."

Richmond upon Thames was the best performing local authority in terms of disability-free life expectancy at birth; for males it was 70.3 years and for females 71.8 years.

A Department of Health spokesperson said: "We have introduced legal duties which make sure that health inequalities are always taken into account when NHS services are planned and provided for - furthermore, NHS England will consider health inequalities when allocating funding to local areas.

"In addition, local authorities have been given a £5.4bn budget over two years to help tackle public health issues such as smoking and obesity. It is vital that they make sure services are available to support local people to live more healthily for longer."

Original Post By: http://ift.tt/1ho7NxN

Source : http://ift.tt/1ho7NxN

Advocate of the Month



MCA Warrior Stories

Inspiring Stories from Courageous Men and Women Dedicated to Increasing Mesothelioma Awareness



The Mesothelioma Cancer Alliance would like to thank Rev. Deborah Vaughn for sharing her experiences with mesothelioma, and cancer in general, as a professional chaplain as the May Advocate of the Month. Rev. Vaughn loves spending time with her husband and daughters, and enjoys gardening and cooking. You can read more about her experiences and stories on her blog, An Unfinished Symphony. MCA: Tell us a little about your experience with mesothelioma.

Rev. Vaughn: I have to be somewhat careful here, because as a chaplain, I have access to private and personal information. I would never divulge something that is privileged medical information. I consider it a sacred privilege to be a chaplain, and take my role, and the confidentiality that comes with my position, very seriously.

I first learned about mesothelioma when a close friend's father was diagnosed with the disease. He had worked in an industry which gave him prolonged exposure to asbestos. When we were told he had malignant pleural mesothelioma, stage 4, it sounded bad. We really didn't know much about the disease and spent some time reading up on it. The news was devastating for all of us. He was diagnosed in late November, and died in February. There was little that could be done for him except palliative measures and the support of hospice.

Several years later, I was working as a professional chaplain and was assigned an outpatient oncology unit as part of my clinical practice. I met several patients and families who were grappling with the effects of mesothelioma and their treatment protocols. As a chaplain, I was a companion, a friend, and if they wanted it, a spiritual guide. Mostly, I just listened to their stories and supported them and their families in end-of-life decisions and spiritual struggles. There were tears and laughter, silence and animated conversation, prayers and hymns. At times we meditated together, or I helped them with relaxation imagery. One individual was not from any faith background at all, but he welcomed the opportunity to find a place of quiet and hope within him. All except one of these individuals has since died. I often think of them and their families and the impact they had on my life. MCA: Has cancer affected you in some way? If so, in what way? Tell us about your experience.

Rev. Vaughn: I grew up in a household where conversations about diagnosis and disease were commonplace. My dad was a pathologist and would tell us about the things he saw. Even though I was not really interested in medicine as a career, I learned vicariously. One sister and one sister-in-law are both physicians, and as they went through medical school, there were many discussions about life, and death, and how disease was managed in between. I learned about risk factors for cancer and how some very simple measures could reduce my personal risk (such as not smoking, and reducing environmental exposure to toxins like radon and asbestos.)

My dad had non-Hodgkin lymphoma and died in February 2000. Even though other close family members had passed away previously, and I had worked for several years in long-term care and acute care settings, his death was the first that touched me deeply and personally. From the earliest stages of his diagnosis, I understood that there might be periods of remission, and that he had about a 60% chance (at that time- now according to the NCI website, the 5 year survival rate is 69.3%) of surviving 5 years after his diagnosis. Dad lived almost 6 1/2 years after his diagnosis and staging, enjoying the arrival of his sixth grandchild. We all still miss him.

I have had other close family members die from complications due to their cancer diagnosis, and other family members who have come safely through their diagnosis and treatment. I've learned that depending on the kind of cancer, and the stage at which it is diagnosed, there are different options and means of treatment. And as new protocols are developed, there is hope for remission and becoming "cancer-free." MCA: How has this shaped you as the person you are today?

Rev. Vaughn: I understand how the word cancer can be terrifying. Many forms are treatable, and even "beatable." But the best treatment is prevention and early detection.

While cancer has lost some of its mystery for me, it can be a personally unsettling matter. I get my screenings and tests for breast cancer every year without fail since I have close female relatives who have had breast cancer. And after a few interesting mammograms which required follow up tests, I have struggled with fear. I was afraid that I could have cancer. It's disconcerting. I felt vulnerable and not in control. I was so grateful for every negative scan since then.

When I walk into a hospital room or a treatment area, I try to let my patients and their families know that I am concerned about their wellbeing. I don't know how they feel about their cancer diagnosis because each of us takes the news differently, and has to face a different treatment path. But I am available to listen to them and to help them sound out what they want to focus on as individuals for this stage of their life. We talk about ways that they can find strength and purpose, and even meaning in their illness. They frequently share their concerns about being a "burden" to their families, and yes,sometimes they are angry that they are ill.

My role as a chaplain is to support them in this journey of illness and sometimes healing. But more than "fixing" their emotional or spiritual state, I am, very simply, a companion. I encourage them find ways to live life to the fullest, even with treatments and doctors appointments filling their lives. I learn so much from my patients and their families. And many times, there are Divine moments where I experience how my own faith is strengthened by their courage. MCA: If you could say one thing to the world about cancer or mesothelioma specifically, what would it be?

Rev. Vaughn: Take care of yourself! Eat right. Exercise. Don't smoke. Avoid toxins, like asbestos. Most important of all, if you sense that something isn't "right" with your body then talk with your physician. You are a person of worth and value and you deserve care and treatment.

Original Post By: http://ift.tt/1iRxg7o

Source : http://ift.tt/1iRxg7o

Advocate of the Month



MCA Warrior Stories

Inspiring Stories from Courageous Men and Women Dedicated to Increasing Mesothelioma Awareness



The Mesothelioma Cancer Alliance would like to thank Rev. Deborah Vaughn for sharing her experiences with mesothelioma, and cancer in general, as a professional chaplain as the May Advocate of the Month. Rev. Vaughn loves spending time with her husband and daughters, and enjoys gardening and cooking. You can read more about her experiences and stories on her blog, An Unfinished Symphony. MCA: Tell us a little about your experience with mesothelioma.

Rev. Vaughn: I have to be somewhat careful here, because as a chaplain, I have access to private and personal information. I would never divulge something that is privileged medical information. I consider it a sacred privilege to be a chaplain, and take my role, and the confidentiality that comes with my position, very seriously.

I first learned about mesothelioma when a close friend's father was diagnosed with the disease. He had worked in an industry which gave him prolonged exposure to asbestos. When we were told he had malignant pleural mesothelioma, stage 4, it sounded bad. We really didn't know much about the disease and spent some time reading up on it. The news was devastating for all of us. He was diagnosed in late November, and died in February. There was little that could be done for him except palliative measures and the support of hospice.

Several years later, I was working as a professional chaplain and was assigned an outpatient oncology unit as part of my clinical practice. I met several patients and families who were grappling with the effects of mesothelioma and their treatment protocols. As a chaplain, I was a companion, a friend, and if they wanted it, a spiritual guide. Mostly, I just listened to their stories and supported them and their families in end-of-life decisions and spiritual struggles. There were tears and laughter, silence and animated conversation, prayers and hymns. At times we meditated together, or I helped them with relaxation imagery. One individual was not from any faith background at all, but he welcomed the opportunity to find a place of quiet and hope within him. All except one of these individuals has since died. I often think of them and their families and the impact they had on my life. MCA: Has cancer affected you in some way? If so, in what way? Tell us about your experience.

Rev. Vaughn: I grew up in a household where conversations about diagnosis and disease were commonplace. My dad was a pathologist and would tell us about the things he saw. Even though I was not really interested in medicine as a career, I learned vicariously. One sister and one sister-in-law are both physicians, and as they went through medical school, there were many discussions about life, and death, and how disease was managed in between. I learned about risk factors for cancer and how some very simple measures could reduce my personal risk (such as not smoking, and reducing environmental exposure to toxins like radon and asbestos.)

My dad had non-Hodgkin lymphoma and died in February 2000. Even though other close family members had passed away previously, and I had worked for several years in long-term care and acute care settings, his death was the first that touched me deeply and personally. From the earliest stages of his diagnosis, I understood that there might be periods of remission, and that he had about a 60% chance (at that time- now according to the NCI website, the 5 year survival rate is 69.3%) of surviving 5 years after his diagnosis. Dad lived almost 6 1/2 years after his diagnosis and staging, enjoying the arrival of his sixth grandchild. We all still miss him.

I have had other close family members die from complications due to their cancer diagnosis, and other family members who have come safely through their diagnosis and treatment. I've learned that depending on the kind of cancer, and the stage at which it is diagnosed, there are different options and means of treatment. And as new protocols are developed, there is hope for remission and becoming "cancer-free." MCA: How has this shaped you as the person you are today?

Rev. Vaughn: I understand how the word cancer can be terrifying. Many forms are treatable, and even "beatable." But the best treatment is prevention and early detection.

While cancer has lost some of its mystery for me, it can be a personally unsettling matter. I get my screenings and tests for breast cancer every year without fail since I have close female relatives who have had breast cancer. And after a few interesting mammograms which required follow up tests, I have struggled with fear. I was afraid that I could have cancer. It's disconcerting. I felt vulnerable and not in control. I was so grateful for every negative scan since then.

When I walk into a hospital room or a treatment area, I try to let my patients and their families know that I am concerned about their wellbeing. I don't know how they feel about their cancer diagnosis because each of us takes the news differently, and has to face a different treatment path. But I am available to listen to them and to help them sound out what they want to focus on as individuals for this stage of their life. We talk about ways that they can find strength and purpose, and even meaning in their illness. They frequently share their concerns about being a "burden" to their families, and yes,sometimes they are angry that they are ill.

My role as a chaplain is to support them in this journey of illness and sometimes healing. But more than "fixing" their emotional or spiritual state, I am, very simply, a companion. I encourage them find ways to live life to the fullest, even with treatments and doctors appointments filling their lives. I learn so much from my patients and their families. And many times, there are Divine moments where I experience how my own faith is strengthened by their courage. MCA: If you could say one thing to the world about cancer or mesothelioma specifically, what would it be?

Rev. Vaughn: Take care of yourself! Eat right. Exercise. Don't smoke. Avoid toxins, like asbestos. Most important of all, if you sense that something isn't "right" with your body then talk with your physician. You are a person of worth and value and you deserve care and treatment.

Original Post By: http://ift.tt/1iRxg7o

Source : http://ift.tt/1iRxg7o

Bay State drugmaker targets asbestos



Heather Von St. James, 45, remembers her father, a demolition worker, coming home covered in dust and dirt. Still, she'd hug him each night and, sometimes, put on his coat and shoes to play.

Thirty years later, she paid a price. At age 36, with a 3-month-old daughter, Von St. James was diagnosed with mesothelioma, a deadly, incurable cancer tied to asbestos exposure that can take decades to develop and often kills within months after symptoms appear. She was told her only chance to live was to have a lung removed.

She opted for surgery, and later learned she had excised the disease in time. "There a lot of people who don't," Von St. James, of St. Paul, Minnesota, said by telephone.

Last year, more than 107,000 people worldwide died from mesothelioma. Now, drugs developed by a wave of drugmakers, from tiny Verastem Inc. in Cambridge, Mass., to giant GlaxoSmithKline Plc in London, are bringing new hope that the deadly disease's silent march within the body may be slowed or stopped.

"This is not a curable cancer," said Dean Fennell, lead investigator in a trial studying Verastem's drug. "It's not a disease that can be wiped out completely by surgery as you see with lung cancer. Finding ways to stop that process or slow it down can have big implications for patient survival."

Mesothelioma, unlike lung cancer, mostly affects the cells covering the lungs, and can also strike tissues around the heart and abdominal organs. As with all cancers, doctors treat mesothelioma by cutting it out, or irradiating it, both of which can carry dangerous side effects.

Verastem, Glaxo

The drug being developed by Verastem is in late-stage human testing. Glaxo's compound is being tried in combination with another product in an early-stage study. Both target an enzyme involved in cell movement, allowing the cancer to spread.

The enzyme is overabundant in many tumors and is a hallmark of aggressive cancers that spread quickly. Patients with an inactive gene called Neurofibromatosis 2, or NF2, respond best to such drugs, and about half of mesothelioma patients have inactive NF2s.

Verastem has been granted orphan drug status in the U.S. and Europe for its product, VS-6063. That means it would have seven years of market exclusivity from the time of approval. If cleared for sale, the drug may generate $450 million by 2019, according to the average of four analysts' estimates compiled by Bloomberg.

Earliest Stage

The medicine, also known as defactinib, targets cancer at its earliest stage: cancer stem cells, which are thought to be the source of the cancer and often resist existing therapies. Mesothelioma cancer stem cells are particularly hardy in that they can survive chemotherapy, Fennell, who is chairman of thoracic medical oncology at the University of Leicester in England, said in an interview.

"The hope is we can suppress the cancer in such a way that it becomes a more chronic disease, rather than have a disease that's going to progress relentlessly and kill the patient," said Fennell, who doesn't have a financial stake in Verastem and isn't a paid consultant, according to the company.

While Verastem, which has a market value of about $215 million, is developing the drug on its own, it has an array of industry heavyweights providing guidance. Board members and advisers include former Genzyme Corp. Chief Executive Officer Henri Termeer; Eric Lander, a principal leader of the Human Genome Project; and Phillip Sharp, a Nobel laureate who helped establish the company now known as Biogen Idec Inc.

Controlling Ownership

"Controlling ownership of our products is key to value creation," said Robert Forrester, Verastem's chief executive officer. "As we pursue clinical development and possible commercialization, we want to make sure that we retain the potential for a significant return on the development investment we are making for our shareholders."

AstraZeneca Plc of London is testing tremelimumab, which it licensed from Pfizer Inc., in mesothelioma in a mid-stage trial. The treatment works differently from the other drugs in development in that it helps the immune system recognize and kill cancer cells.

Glaxo, the U.K.'s biggest drugmaker, plans to test GSK2256098 in combination with some of its other medicines to potentially make cancer treatments more effective, Carolyn Buser-Doepner, vice president for tumor signaling at the London- based company, said in an interview. In one early-stage trial, it will be paired up with Glaxo's Mekinist, which is approved for melanoma.

"The pre-clinical data are very encouraging," she said. "We're very excited about it."

Boehringer's Drug

Glaxo said it will continue developing the drug after selling most of its cancer medicines to Novartis AG for as much as $16 billion. Novartis will have the right to partner with Glaxo on the product.

A fourth drug, nintedanib from Germany's Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH, is in early-stage testing for mesothelioma, according to a spokesman. It works differently than the other two medicines, targeting three proteins involved in the formation of blood vessels that feed tumors.

While it's encouraging to see treatments being tested for mesothelioma, the kind of research most likely to yield improvements in care is that looking into the nature of the disease itself, said Noel Snell, director of research at the British Lung Foundation.

"It is shameful that this kind of fundamental research remains so drastically underfunded, and that the number of trials available for mesothelioma patients is still dwarfed so dramatically by the number available to other cancer patients," Snell said in a statement.

In the U.S., $8.8 million in government funding has gone to research the disease, according to the Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation.

Miracle Fiber

Asbestos was commonly used in building materials such as insulation for years because it was cheap, abundant and heat- resistant. Considered a "miracle fiber," it has been the subject of lawsuits claiming losses and damages from asbestos- related illnesses.

While some countries have banned asbestos mining, it continues in Russia, China and India, and the World Health Organization estimates as many as 125 million people worldwide are exposed to asbestos either at work or in their homes.

Mesothelioma can lay dormant for as long as 50 years before spreading, which explains why rates have risen long after many countries have banned the substance.

New cases in the U.K., where asbestos was restricted starting in the 1980s and outlawed fully in 2006, were 2,125 in 2012 and are expected to peak in 2015. Rates have been stable in the U.S., hovering around 3,000 new cases a year since 2000 due to education efforts, though a complete ban was overturned in the courts. Canada, which was one of the world's largest asbestos exporters, closed its remaining mines in 2011.

Japan 'Tsunami'

In Japan, where asbestos has been banned since 2006, the government pays the full cost of treatment for related illnesses and rates are expected to rise until 2027. Ken Takahashi, the lead author and director of a World Health Organization occupational health group, warned that Asian governments must brace themselves for an "asbestos tsunami."

"In the early '70s, this was an incredibly rare disease," Fennell said. "Now my clinic is full of patients with mesothelioma. Because the rates are increasing, we have a real need now to identify effective treatment."

For survivors like Von St. James, who has trouble breathing during the Minnesota winter with her one remaining lung, a solution can't come fast enough. She volunteers to coach patients through the deadly cancer, and says it's hard to watch so many friends lose the battle.

"The survival rate is pitifully 4 percent, most people don't live past 15 or 18 months," she said. "If they can keep it under control, that's the first hope."



Original Post By: http://ift.tt/1lMCyBm

Source : http://ift.tt/1lMCyBm